must be presumed to have seen such gazette notifications.
It is late for him to protest now, & I don't suppose he would have done so, had he not been goaded &c.
So, if we consider Ackroyd's similar protest:
In two cases that are not at all similar.
position however are not
•Exactly
M. Sangster is simply in the same position as many other officers who, with over 14 percent increase in pay, would in future have their pension paid at 3/3.
were given
2 Reply
reason for that is that the Secretary of State sees no reason for reconsidering the decision that was taken in his case.
return Enc. 8 his letter su928Jan C.P.2-28
L
Yes. Mr. Chamberlain will remember that in the case of Mr. Justice Ackroyd, where he was with a distant wind, the former head of the department, the pensioner in question lost his right to the higher rate by being promoted to a still better paid office which, however, had not been raised in pay at all, and was not then within the terms of the decision given by His Excellency. As Ackroyd was not within the terms, his right to the higher rate revived, and two months later, he was admitted to be so.
The present claim has no such ground. He simply pleads ignorance of Mathieson's notification, which is a matter of common knowledge.
It is wholly untrue that he was not notified in this way. Hyperbole sent in a little place like this, where the officials have nothing else to do but "talk shop", he comes to have remained ignorant of what was
must be presumed to have seen ouch fazette notifications.
It is the late for him to protest now, & I don't suppose he wired have done
had notgirlded &M.
so, if we
Ackroyd's similar protest:
In two cases
at all similar.
position
however are not
•Exactly
M. Sangster is simply in the saine many other officers whe over 14 percent increase que condition that their pension
at 3/3. be paid at would in future
were
given
2 Reply
reason for
that 1 of State sees no reconsidering
that was taken in
the decisim
his case
retum Enc. 8 his letter
su928Jan
C.P.2-28
L
Yes. M. (hamberlain will remember that in
this case of Mr. Justice Acroyd where be with
A
distant wind former tent of the department,
the peusimmer an pirt lost his restert in the
higher take by setting the 14 he cant increas
aris there had them permoted puttin
to a still better baid office which, howung
had not been raised in pay
668
at all, and hot was
hot thenfere within the terms of the decisions given.
by hus Kuntotus. Ar bcroyd wrtion des tant leis
right to the higher rate revived, and two shemtulain
bett Immand to admit Urte beir uno so.
The
brennt claim and has no such gromed
Jom.
He simply plents ipoance of Mathies.
which are of Commun.
knownige and
Ane
It is wholly
notified in this woul way.
hiperbole tent in a little blace like they
Kny
where the officials han nothing
Elve to do hish talle" shops", he comes have
remained ignorant of white was
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.